Tension Between African Americans and Jews Electorally Crucial

by Kendall Clark

WASHINGTON - The intensifying violence in the Middle East is straining relations between black and Jewish leaders in the United States, with potentially serious consequences for the Democratic Party.

The conflict between two of the party’s strongest support groups - which have a history dating to the civil rights era of working together - threatens to harm the Democrats’ chances of regaining control of Congress this fall, analysts say.

Black and Jewish Democrats in Congress have been working quietly for months to try to repair the growing rift between African-Americans, who resent efforts by Israel’s supporters to defeat black incumbents, and Jews, whose interest groups have in recent months helped oust two black lawmakers they considered anti-Israel.

“It has to be a worry for the Democrats,” says David Bositis, senior political analyst at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, an African-American think tank. “The worry is that some percentage of black voters will become disaffected and won’t vote in November.”

The problem is being discussed at the highest levels of Democratic leadership in Congress, where black and Jewish House leaders have had meetings this summer to try to cool tempers and resolve differences.

“All of us were becoming concerned that the gap could possibly get wider and wider, and we didn’t want that to happen,” said Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, a Baltimore Democrat and the vice chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus.

The conflict has surfaced at a time when Jewish leaders are increasingly sensitive to criticism of Israel and more determined than ever to show support for the Jewish state.

“The level of violence in the Mideast, the level of killing is … just alarming,” said Ira N. Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council. Consequently, Jews are “more focused than in the recent past on U.S.-Israel relations.”

That focus has already helped defeat two black Democratic House members in bitter primary battles. Both incumbents lost to black challengers who were supported by pro-Israel political action committees.

Most recently, Rep. Cynthia A. McKinney, who received hefty financial support from Arab-Americans, lost in Georgia last week to Denise L. Majette, a former state judge who was backed by pro-Israel groups.

McKinney, a liberal firebrand who has often taken controversial positions during her 10 years in Congress, gained notoriety in the spring when she accused President Bush of ignoring warnings of the Sept. 11 attacks. In addition, some Muslim groups that contributed to McKinney’s campaign have been investigated for ties to terrorism.

Despite McKinney’s vulnerability, many black leaders blamed her defeat on pro-Israel interest groups, which mobilized intensely on behalf of the more moderate Majette. After his daughter lost the primary, state Rep. Billy McKinney told WXIA-TV in Atlanta: “Jews have bought everybody. Jews … J-E-W-S.”

Black leaders in Washington have been more politic in their statements, but it is clear they are no less worried about the issue.

“It appears some elements of the Jewish community have become more aggressive, and it’s unprecedented, and I think it risks rupturing the traditional black-Jewish alliance,” said Rep. Albert R. Wynn, a Prince George’s County Democrat.

Pro-Israel PAC money

McKinney’s loss was not the first to distress African-American members of Congress. In Alabama’s Democratic primary in June, pro-Israel political action committees threw their support - and tens of thousands of dollars - behind attorney Artur G. Davis, who defeated five-term Rep. Earl F. Hilliard, who has expressed pro-Palestinian views.

Hilliard was reproached by the House ethics committee last year for taking campaign funds for personal use, and he drew criticism in 1997 for visiting Libya in defiance of a State Department travel ban.

Jewish lawmakers defended the pro-Israel lobby’s involvement.

“The Jewish community has very strong beliefs about political involvement in issues that are important to them,” said Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin, a Baltimore Democrat.

Wynn did not attend this summer’s meetings with Jewish House members “because I felt that the Jewish leaders feel as strongly about Israel as African-Americans feel about apartheid,” he said, meaning he saw little middle ground.

According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, pro-Israel political groups - which have a long record of heavy financial involvement in elections - have given $3.6 million to candidates during this election cycle, as of July 29.

Pro-Israel interest groups gave Alabama’s Davis at least $68,567, according to the center, and were his biggest source of financial support. Georgia’s Majette received substantial funding from out-of-state Jewish donors as well, including $14,250 from pro-Israel political action committees, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

Endangered from start

Even Hilliard’s and McKinney’s supporters concede that the two incumbents were endangered from the beginning, and some Jewish leaders said the two were defeated because they had lost touch with their constituents.

“After Sept. 11, people are looking for serious representation,” said Malcolm Hoenlein, executive director of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. “All politics ultimately are local. People voted and acted based upon their evaluation of the candidates.”

Still, the level of intensity pro-Israel groups harnessed to help defeat the two Democratic incumbents raises concerns for many blacks.

‘Voters in a bind’

“It puts black voters in a bind because you could end up with some people in the Congress who are black but who don’t represent the broad mainstream views of the black community,” says Ronald Walters, director of the African American Leadership Institute at the University of Maryland, College Park.

And there is another major difference in how black and Jewish members view the involvement of pro-Israel groups in the two primary battles.

“The black community sees this as a racial issue,” Wynn said. “The white Jewish community sees it as an ideological, foreign-policy issue.”

Said Cardin, “The fact that these were black members made it more difficult for the Jewish community, not less.”

(Rift between blacks, Jews worries Democrats for fall)

3 Responses to “Tension Between African Americans and Jews Electorally Crucial”

  1. Magnum Says:

    When you say
    > efforts by Israel’s supporters to
    > defeat black incumbents
    that looks like a reference to C McKinney.
    Didn’t she get voted out because of a
    Republican campaign, which I suppose would
    hawe been due to her views about White House
    culpability and inaction before Sep 11?
    What other examples are there of Israeli
    pressure groups working against black
    representatives?

  2. Jake Says:

    Jewish-Americans only represent 2% of the population, and about a quarter of them are Republicans. Yet they are extraordinarily active politically, and have always given Democratic candidates the impression that they are ‘essential’ to their candidacy. African-Americans represent 13% of the population and outnumber Jews in every state in the union. If any constituency is essential to Democrats, it is African-Americans.

    I am outraged by the tactics used by AIPAC (American-Israel PAC), the ADL, Bnai Brth, and other organizations to control elections and concentrate political power. Howard Dean recently made a statement saying that America needs to be an even-handed broker in the Mideast conflict. He was immediately attacked by Nancy Pelosi and Howard Berman who circulated a letter to all of their ‘friends of Israel’ in the House and sent it to Dean. Then the head of the ADL attacked him.

    These ‘friends of Israel’ in Congress seem to spend more time working for Israel than their own districts. Why? There is a lot of money at stake. American taxpayers send Israel over $11 billion a year. Added up, since 1973 we have sent over $70,000 to each Israeli household. Yet Israelis live longer than Americans and earn more than African-Americans. This is what they are protecting. The $11 billion / year could create 250,000 American jobs or pay tuition for 1.3 million American students. Instead it is going to a small country with blatantly discriminatory laws; and one which has routinely violated several U.N. Security Council resolutions.

    Our “special relationship” with Israel is to unilaterally support an apartheid regime (settlement building for Jews only, Jewish-only right-of return, Jewish-only citizenship laws). The Sharon government’s policies are extraodinarily provocative and dangerous to both Palestinians and Israelis. Israel has rejected U.N. resolutions for peacekeeping forces twice. In other words, they are satisfied with the job they are doing, which has resulted in a suicide bombing every week. What does that tell you? Israel does not want any outside force to monitor the situation because they know their Zionist policies are illegitimate, illegal under international law, and racist. Any American politician who unilaterally supports Israel should explain why they support a government who’s laws would be considered appallingly racist in the U.S.

    This is not just an African-American issue, it is an American issue. Cynthia McKinney is not the only candidate dismantled by the Zionist machine.

    There is a petition to Howard Dean to explain his one-sided views on the Mideast and his relationship to AIPAC. This is what prompted him to make the ‘even-handed’ statement that in turn prompted the knee-jerk response from Pelosi and Berman. Please sign it if you agree.

    http://www.stop-us-military-aid-to-israel.net/deanpetition/

  3. Stuart Says:

    Couldn’t agree more with you Jake. Israel is the new South Africa. And the US is treating Israel the same way it treated South Africa during apartheid — as an ally. I don’t want my tax dollars contributing to this any more.

    Thanks for pointing out the petition, I signed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Creative Commons License