<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanity Fair Editors Apologize</title>
	<link>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/</link>
	<description>Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MemeFirst</title>
		<link>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-523</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-523</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dame Edna fired from Vanity Fair&lt;/strong&gt;

Do you remember, back at the beginning of the year, a minor dust-up about Dame Edna Everage's advice column in the issue of Vanity Fair with Salma Hayek on the cover? Well, the magazine apologized while making the column's satirical...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Dame Edna fired from Vanity Fair</strong></p>
	<p>Do you remember, back at the beginning of the year, a minor dust-up about Dame Edna Everage&#8217;s advice column in the issue of Vanity Fair with Salma Hayek on the cover? Well, the magazine apologized while making the column&#8217;s satirical&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Adcox</title>
		<link>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-522</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-522</guid>
					<description>Interesting name ya got. Whiteprivilege.com? Nice to see you're (cough, cough) &quot;opposed&quot; to racism. Kinda like those pisswed off feminists who bash males because they (wink, wink) &quot;oppose&quot; sexism.

So by your type of logic I could make the argument that your hate speech on the board is intended to harass those of us who suffer from mental illness. I think I could make that argument in court. Oh, and if by some chance you happen to have 501c3 status, I could petition the courts to jerk your website off of the internet for your hate-driven, anti-white agenda.



  Defiantly,



  Robert Adcox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Interesting name ya got. Whiteprivilege.com? Nice to see you&#8217;re (cough, cough) &#8220;opposed&#8221; to racism. Kinda like those pisswed off feminists who bash males because they (wink, wink) &#8220;oppose&#8221; sexism.</p>
	<p>So by your type of logic I could make the argument that your hate speech on the board is intended to harass those of us who suffer from mental illness. I think I could make that argument in court. Oh, and if by some chance you happen to have 501c3 status, I could petition the courts to jerk your website off of the internet for your hate-driven, anti-white agenda.</p>
	<p>  Defiantly,</p>
	<p>  Robert Adcox
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mister America</title>
		<link>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-521</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-521</guid>
					<description>con-tro-ver-sy n, 1: a discussion marked esp. by the expression of opposing views.

Here's an opposing view: jokes are funnier after they've been explained.
Here's another one: nothing worth reading should be found in a supermarket.

Feh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>con-tro-ver-sy n, 1: a discussion marked esp. by the expression of opposing views.</p>
	<p>Here&#8217;s an opposing view: jokes are funnier after they&#8217;ve been explained.<br />
Here&#8217;s another one: nothing worth reading should be found in a supermarket.</p>
	<p>Feh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rurik</title>
		<link>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-520</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://whiteprivilege.com/2003/03/06/vanity-fair-editors-apologize/#comment-520</guid>
					<description>The apology's been out since February 14th, before you even posted anything about the whole Dame Edna controversy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The apology&#8217;s been out since February 14th, before you even posted anything about the whole Dame Edna controversy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
